A 2014 article published in Forbes magazine
discusses the recent decline in Chinese manufacturing, a market in which the
United States had been losing out on for quite some time. The reason these manufacturing
jobs moved from the US to China, and now to countries such as Indonesia and the
Philippines is because they have the advantage. If all of our tech items and
clothing items were manufactured in the US they would cost an astronomical
amount more. In order to have cohesive global trade, countries must accept what
they do and do not have the comparative advantage over, and sometimes this can
show the overall dark side of an advantage.
We see the impact of comparative advantage
everyday even if we do not realize it. Often it effects are condemned, but
nothing is really done to drastically change it. Mainly because if a shirt made
in Taiwan costs $5, but if it were made here would put a $30 dent in our
wallets, we could choose the Taiwanese shirt, every time. This is because we
are rational consumers, and not every product should be made on our shores.
American Apparel is a
clothing company that manufactures all of its items in the United States. That
means they pay their workers fair wages, they work reasonable hours, and
receive healthcare benefits if they qualify. Because of this, their clothes are
substantially more expensive, than something I could easily purchase at
Forever21, a retailer that relies on manufactures Asian countries where labor
laws are less strict. Because of this, Forever21 has a higher profit margin
because they rely on unethical labor, whereas American Apparel suffers because
they have to hike up their prices in order to cover labor costs. What I am mainly
asking is one retailer taking the benefits of comparative advantage too
far?
We produce clothing and
technology in other countries for a reason, as Americans we would not like to
pay the price of fair labor. This is a hard truth to accept, but it is the
harsh reality of what comparative advantage can also do. Yes, in some cases one
country really does find news ways to manufacture a product that is far
superior than another country, but in terms of auto-manufacturing and clothing,
are there really Americans who could not perform? Overtime we have moved these
jobs overseas because it is simply more cost-effective. The next iPhone will be
born in Silicon Valley, but it will be manufactured across the Pacific.
The United States actually
invented the concept of sweatshops, something that gives countries such the
Philippines and Indonesia the advantage because they did not have the
safe-labor revolutions that we had in this country. Ford also revolutionized
the auto industry by implementing the assembly line in his car manufacturing
plants. But, auto and clothing manufacturing has not changed in modern times,
just changed locations. The United States
simply lost it’s advantage in manufacturing. This has not hurt our country
overall, but has actually harbored healthy trade relations with other
countries.
Comparative Advantage
overall harbors a healthier global trade economy This, however, does not
detract from the dark side that sometimes sees the light of the media, but we
are too busy reaping the benefits to really change the system and subsequently
lose out on an obvious manufacturing advantage.
Forbes-Manufacturing Beyond China
Forever21 Cheap Manufacturing
I think you are right because overall these sweatshops do improve the economy but they still decrease the wealth for some countries. Some of these developing world countries are seeing a lot of inequality because of these cheap manufacturers. I also think that other countries feel this comparative advantage much stronger than the U.S. does.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with your argument in this post. The American economy does not necessarily rely on how many jobs we have, rather how many good jobs we have. The recent recession skyrocketed the unemployment rate. But one thing that has been constantly overlooked is the underemployment rate, which has significantly increased since the Great Recession. Underemployment means that quality of your job matches your qualifications as a worker. Underemployment, currently, is a huge problem in the U.S. We have graduates from top universities working at jobs that do not meet their skill level. So, you are telling me that you would like these underpaying, unsatisfying jobs here in America, when people overseas are willing and able to do those jobs. I am not saying everyone in America should be a doctor or a lawyer. But in order to grow the economy, you need to grow the quality of the actual jobs that are out there. You will not be able to do that if you have millions of Americans working in sweat shops.
ReplyDelete